RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01422
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her place of entry on active duty (PLEAD) be corrected to reflect Knoxville, Tennessee (TN).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She entered active duty at the Knoxville, TN MEPS center to participate in the Nurse Transition Program (NTP) and needs her separation move to be funded according to her PLEAD rather than her home of record (HOR).
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a member of the Air Force serving in the grade of captain. Block 1 of the AF IMT Form 766, Extended Active Duty Order, reflects Trout Dale, VA as the address she would depart from for active duty. Block 5 of the AF IMT Form 766 is left blank and states same as Block 1 unless otherwise indicated.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPANF2 recommends denial. On 13 Mar 08, the applicant commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Air Force Reserve. In May 08 the applicant accessed into active duty and recorded Trout Dale, VA as her HOR on the AF Form 24, Application for Appointment as a Reserve of the Air Force Officer. Additionally, in May 08 she informed the Extended Active Duty order-issuing and authenticating official her PLEAD was Trout Dale, VA and therefore it was placed on her EAD order (AF 766).
A request was not received from the applicant to change her HOR to her PLEAD according to item 6 on the reverse side of her EAD order and after further review she was paid for travel from the address reflected on her EAD order.
The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), Volume I, Appendix A1 reads the place to which an order to active duty is addressed and the place at which the member attains a military status or at which the member enters the service. Additionally, it states that the PLEAD changes only if there is a break in service exceeding one full day, in which case it is the place of entry into the new period of service.
There is no justification to warrant correction to her PLEAD to reflect Knoxville, TN.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPNAF2 evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01422 in Executive Session on 29 Jan 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Mar 14.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPANF2, dated 26 Jun 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01367
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides his Michigan state medical license; internship completion certificate from the hospital he was trained; a letter of acceptance for residency upon completion of his military commitment; his travel order for a flight physical showing he resided in Rochester Hills, MI; and a copy of his AF IMT 766, Extended Active Duty Order. Block 5 of the AF IMT Form 766 lists Mawdan, ND as his Home of Record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02328
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02328 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 7a Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD), be corrected to reflect San Antonio, Texas. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03675
On 4 January 2005, the applicant was appointed to the Air Force Reserve via AF Form 24, Application for Appointment as Reserve of the Air Force or USAF without Component, and recorded her HOR address as Boynton Beach-Palm Beach, FL. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03598
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03598 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Albuquerque, NM to San Antonio, TX. Joint Federal Travel Regulation Volume I, Appendix A1, states in part that a HOR is the place recorded as the individuals home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty unless there is a break...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01123
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01123 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty; be changed to Lackland AFB, TX. His DD Form 214 shows Place of Entry Into Active Duty (PLEAD) and Home of Record (HOR) as Bartlett, IL. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00320
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00320 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD), and Item 7b, Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect College Station, Texas. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03649
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with the JFTR, the applicant recorded her PLEAD as Galveston, TX and had no breaks in service; therefore her extended active duty order reflected her PLEAD as Galveston, TX when...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02513
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02513 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The departure address in item 1 on his AF Form 766, Extended Active Duty (EAD) Order, dated 25 March 2002, be changed to reflect his Home of Record (HOR) address. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02428
His extended active duty (EAD) orders be corrected to show his EAD date as 10 June 2006 rather than 17 June 2006. An AF IMT Form 766, Extended Active Duty Order, reflects the effective date of duty as 17 June 2006, with two days travel time. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-02428 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02924
Item 7a (Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD)) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Tuscaloosa, AL. b. Item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Clifton, VA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...